The Solana price faced significant upward pressure as the broader market sentiments turned bearish following Trump’s address on the ongoing war. After losing a key support zone, the SOL is now trapped below the resistance, which may resemble a distribution, not a recovery. However, the buyers have not stepped in with conviction, while the price has not reclaimed any critical levels. As long as the SOL price does not reclaim its lost structure, the downside risk continues to prevail.
Hence, now the question arises whether the current correction is another consolidation or an accumulation.
Solana has lost a major horizontal support zone around $110–$120, a level that previously acted as a strong demand base throughout multiple cycles. Currently, the same level has flipped into resistance, where a retest may turn into selling opportunities hereafter. Historically, these types of structures tend to resolve lower.
The broader structure shows lower highs forming consistently after failure to reclaim key resistance between $110 and $120. Moreover, the recovery was extremely low after a sharp decline due to a weak bounce. Moreover, it is compressing just above a major downside target, highlighting a critical support level at $50.
This is the level where previous consolidation occurred with a strong demand, where risk-reward becomes attractive again. Therefore, the trade set suggests the SOL price may continue to remain range-bound and further initiate a breakdown to the demand zone.
Collectively, Solana is trading below broken structure and remains a wait-for-confirmation market, not a bottoming market. Failure to reclaim $100 to $110 keeps the pressure intact, while a breakdown below the range opens a move toward $60 first, then $50, which is the key accumulation zone. Until then, every bounce is likely a lower high in formation, not the start of a new rally.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
