Perp DEX’s have delivered plenty of activity, but the tokens aren’t moving as one. In 2026, HYPE is up 113%, while ASTER is down 13% and LIT has slipped 5%. The number behind the three venues make the gap even harder to ignore.
Hyperliquid Still Owns Most Trading Activity
Over the past 30 days, Hyperliquid processed $198.4 billion in derivatives volume, compared with $40 billion for Aster and $33.8 billion for Lighter. That gives HYPE roughly 72.9% of combined flow.
The fee picture is even more striking. As Hyperliquid generated $48.3 million in fees, versus $4.4 million for Aster and $2.5 million for Lighter.
Open interest also shows the similar story, where HYPE is having $9 billion, $1.9 billion for ASTER, and $700 million for LIT.
Lighter Looks Cheap, But Revenue Lags
Lighter’s appeal is valuation.volume-to-market cap ratio stands at 0.017, compared with 0.040 for ASTER and 0.061 for HYPE, while retail traders pay zero fees.
But that advantage comes with a catch. Lighter generated only $24 million in holder revenue over trailing year, compared with $765 million for HYPE and $12 million for ASTER.
Meanwhile, Aster has more than 2 million wallets, but the provided data describes much of that activity as heavily farm driven. Hyperliquid has more than 300K active traders, with a smaller but reportedly more organic user base.
Token Valuations Make The Decision Messier
The problem is dilution. HYPE carries a $12.05 billion market cap against $51.76 billion FDV, while ASTER sits at $1.61 billion versus $4.69 billion versus $4.69 billion and LIT at $581 million versus $2.32 billion.
So yes, Hyperliquid dominates usage revenue. But at a $51 billion FDV, the market already knows it. While, Lighter looks cheaper on several measures but needs to convert usage into stronger holder accrual, while Aster has to prove its wallet numbers translate into durable flow.
For Perp DEX’s, the trade off is becoming clear that HYPE is the established leader, LIT is the value argument, and ASTER remains the momentum bet.
Loading article prices
Was this writing helpful?
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Read the Next News
